<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dave Stopher SEO &#187; Computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davestopherseo.co.uk/category/computing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davestopherseo.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Has Google Caffiene had a Algorithm Change</title>
		<link>http://www.davestopherseo.co.uk/google-caffiene-119/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davestopherseo.co.uk/google-caffiene-119/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-s.net/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is alot of news at the minute that suggests that the new google caffeine update has not just changed how google search engine speed operates but the algorithm has changed aswell. I have been playing about with the sand box and there has been some changes. I will in the next couple of days [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is alot of news at the minute that suggests that the new google caffeine update has not just changed how google search engine speed operates but the algorithm has changed aswell.</p>
<p>I have been playing about with the sand box and there has been some changes.</p>
<p>I will in the next couple of days spend some time forming examples of ways that teh agorithm looks like it has changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davestopherseo.co.uk/google-caffiene-119/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some People Thing That Complaining Will get Faster Broadband</title>
		<link>http://www.davestopherseo.co.uk/some-people-thing-that-complaining-will-get-faster-broadband-91/</link>
		<comments>http://www.davestopherseo.co.uk/some-people-thing-that-complaining-will-get-faster-broadband-91/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dave-s.net/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well there wrong. Todays news goes on about the fact that no one is getting the best speed broadband in the UK. Which is correct no one is getting the correct speed, but not for the reason you think. The main reason that you don&#8217;t get fast speed is that, the way internet runs it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there wrong.</p>
<p>Todays news goes on about the fact that no one is getting the best speed broadband in the UK. Which is correct no one is getting the correct speed, but not for the reason you think.</p>
<p>The main reason that you don&#8217;t get fast speed is that, the way internet runs it was never designed to run through wireless technology. Due this the Internet looses half of the packets it sends and receives so it appears that the Internet is reduced by 50%.</p>
<p>This morning though when I was watching the BBC the guest from the Apprentice turned round and said that you should just complain and complain and then you will get the service, which is basically not true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.davestopherseo.co.uk/some-people-thing-that-complaining-will-get-faster-broadband-91/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
